Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 908 F.2d 462 - Self Directed Placement Corp. v. Control Data Corp.

Self Directed Placement Corp. v. Control Data Corp.’s Empirical Analysis

908 F.2d 462 · 1990

Citation profile

80
cited by 80 later decisions
2
states following
December 2018
most recently cited

37 federal appellate · 8 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 80 later decisions — most recently December 2018 · most notably Kaplan v. Rose (1994), Acequia Inc. v. Clinton (1994)

37 federal appellate · 8 district · 2 state decisions

500199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 17 U.S.C. § 102 (§ 101 of the Copyright Act of 1976)

Relies on Conley v. Gibson · Kliewer v. New Jersey · International News Service v. Associated Press · Easter House v. United States · 35 Cal. 3d 197 - Committee on Children's Television, Inc. v. General Foods Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 80 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'set forth enough details so as to provide [Defendants] and the court with a fair idea of the basis of the complaint and the legal grounds claimed for recovery.'”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “) appeal the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Control Data Corporation and Control Data Institute (collectively,”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[d]erive[ ] independent economic value, present or potential, from not being generally known to, and not being readily ascertainable by proper means by, other persons who can obtain economic value from its disclosure or use.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.