United States v. Graves’s Empirical Analysis
908 F.2d 528 · 1990
Citation profile
18
cited by 18 later decisions
June 1999
most recently cited
14 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 111 (Federal Judiciary Protection Act of 2002) · 18 U.S.C. § 3742 · 18 U.S.C. § 924
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“normal reading of that term refers to the victim of the charged [offense].”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Relevant Conduct (Factors that Determine the Guideline Range)”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“as used in U.S.S.G. § 2A2.2(b)(3)(A) was meant to refer only to the victim of the aggravated assault of which the defendant was convicted. In Graves, a two level increase was assessed for bodily injury to an officer that the defendant hit with his car while fleeing from the assault on another officer. The Ninth Circuit reversed finding that the normal reading of the term”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.