Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 908 F.2d 85 - United States v. Castro

United States v. Castro’s Empirical Analysis

908 F.2d 85 · 1990

Citation profile

156
cited by 156 later decisions
March 2017
most recently cited

102 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 156 later decisions — most recently March 2017 · most notably United States v. Moreno (1991), United States v. Martinez (2005)

102 federal appellate ·

1340199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on United States v. Young · United States v. Calandra · Missouri v. Continential Insurance Cos. · Hoffa v. United States · Atlantic Richfield Co. v. Newman Oil Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 156 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Inappropriate remarks by the prosecutor do not alone justify reversal of a criminal conviction in an otherwise fair proceeding, as long as the jury's ability to judge the evidence fairly remains intact.”
    15 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[A]lthough it strongly appears that [Reeves] was not denied effective assistance of counsel, this court declines to consider the claim of ineffective assistance of counsel for the first time on appeal.”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “In order to deny a defendant a fair trial, prosecutorial misconduct and improper argument must be 'so pronounced and persistent that it permeate[d] the entire atmosphere of the trial.'”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.