Coleman v. Re Honsted’s Empirical Analysis
908 F.2d 906 · 1990
Citation profile
4 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3551 (Mandatory Victims Restitution Act of 1996) · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 991
Relies on Bonner v. City of Prichard · Kramer v. Oc Jenkins · Page v. United States Parole Commission · Shahid v. Crawford · Ochoa v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“thirty-six days after the Sentencing Reform Act had taken effect,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Lyons v. Mendez
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.