Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

908 F.2d 966

Docket No. 90-6791.

Baxter v. Sohr

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted: June 4, 1990. Decided: June 20, 1990.

This page is marked noindex.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1990-06-20

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1990-06-20

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Paul V. Niemeyer, District Judge. (C/A No. 89-291-PN).

Julius A. Baxter, appellant pro se.

Gertrude Catherine Bartel, Aron Uri Raskas, Kramon & Graham, P.A., Baltimore, Md.; John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Stephanie Judith Lane-Weber, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Md., for appellees.

D.Md.

AFFIRMED.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and CHAPMAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Julius A. Baxter appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Baxter v. Sohr, C/A No. 89-291-PN (D.Md. Feb. 13, 1990). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2

AFFIRMED.

/908/f2d/966 · .json · Public domain