Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

908 F.2d 966

Docket No. 89-6813.

Ganey v. Johnson

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted: Feb. 20, 1990. Decided: June 26, 1990.

This page is marked noindex.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1990-06-26

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1990-06-26

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, District Judge. (C/A No. 87-194-CRT).

Edward A. Ganey, Jr., appellant pro se.

Sylvia Hargett Thibaut, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, N.C., for appellees.

E.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before WIDENER, SPROUSE and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Edward A. Ganey, Jr. appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Ganey v. Johnson, CA-87-194-CRT (E.D.N.C. Sept. 5, 1989). We deny the motion for stay and the motion for appointment of counsel.

¶2

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

/908/f2d/966 · .json · Public domain