Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

908 F.2d 968

Docket No. 90-6758.

United States v. Douglas Brian Shrock, United States of America v. Tina Marie Leduc

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted May 4, 1990. Decided July 16, 1990.

This page is marked noindex.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Carl E. Thompson v. Louis W. Sullivan, Secretary of Health and Human Services · 728 F. Supp. 1241 - Barentine v. United States

Opinion by Per Curiam ·

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert D. Potter, Chief District Judge. (CR-85-62-C; CA-89-105-C-P)

Lewis Greg Barentine, appellant pro se.

Max Oliver Cogburn, Jr., Office of the United States Attorney, Asheville, N.C., for appellee.

W.D.N.C., 728 F.Supp. 1241

AFFIRMED.

Before K.K. HALL and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Lewis Greg Barentine appeals from the district court's order refusing relief under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Barentine, CR-85-62-C; CA-89-105-C-P (W.D.N.C. Jan. 9, 1990). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2

AFFIRMED.

/908/f2d/968 · .json · Public domain