Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

908 F.2d 968

Docket Nos. 89-7833, 89-7834.

United States v. Meredith

Full caption · 2 consolidated cases

  • UNITED STATES of Americav.Melvin MEREDITH
  • UNITED STATES of Americav.Rubin PARKER, a/k/a Eddie Bo

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted: Feb. 15, 1990. Decided: June 20, 1990.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Carl E. Thompson v. Louis W. Sullivan, Secretary of Health and Human Services

Opinion by Per Curiam ·

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CR No. 85-541-S; C/A No. 89-2366-S).

Melvin Meredith, Rubin Parker, appellants pro se.

Catherine Curtis Blake, Office of the United States Attorney, Baltimore, for appellee.

D.Md.

AFFIRMED.

Before PHILLIPS, CHAPMAN and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Melvin Meredith appeals from the district court's order refusing relief under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255. Rubin Parker appeals from the district court's denial of his Fed.R.Crim.P. 35 motion for correction of sentence. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that these appeals are without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Meredith, CR No. 85-541-S; C/A No. 89-2366-S (D.Md. Aug. 28, 1989); United States v. Parker, CR No. 85-541-S (D.Md. Oct. 3, 1989). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2

AFFIRMED.

/908/f2d/968 · .json · Public domain