Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

908 F.2d 974

Docket No. 90-5814.

United States v. Evans

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals

Relies on Henry v. City of Detroit Manpower Department · Henry v. City of Detroit Manpower Department · Holt v. Ford

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.

Before KRUPANSKY and BOGGS, Circuit Judges, and CELEBREZZE, Senior Circuit Judge.

ORDER

¶1

This matter is before the court upon consideration of appellant's motions for appointment of counsel and for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis.

¶2

A review of the documents before the court indicates that appellant appealed on June 14, 1990, from the order entered June 1, 1990, denying appointment of counsel. Such an order is not appealable. Holt v. Ford, 862 F.2d 850, 851 (11th Cir.1989) (en banc); Henry v. City of Detroit Manpower Dep't, 763 F.2d 757, 764 (6th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1036 (1985).

¶3

It is ORDERED that the motions for counsel and pauper status on appeal be denied and the appeal be, and it hereby is, dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Rule 9(b)(1), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.

/908/f2d/974 · .json · Public domain