Bell v. Vacuforce, LLC’s Empirical Analysis
908 F.3d 1075 · 2018
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 17 U.S.C. § 505 (§ 101 of the Copyright Act of 1976) · 28 U.S.C. § 1915A · 28 U.S.C. § 1927
Relies on Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp. · Fogerty Fantasy Inc · Tci Limited William Needler Associates Ltd 1081800 · Puffer v. Allstate Insurance · In re Ronco, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a path that a reasonably careful attorney would have known, after appropriate inquiry, to be unsound.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Matter Of Lisse
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.