United States v. Birchette’s Empirical Analysis
908 F.3d 50 · 2018
Citation profile
3 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 922 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 924 · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 843 (§ 403 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on Allen v. United States · Powers v. Ohio · Tanner v. United States · McDonald v. Pless · The United States v. Thomas Reid and Edward Clements
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he new evidence must be reasonably tailored to rebut the original evidence,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“after the opposing party has 'opened the door' to its admission.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.