United States v. Thomas’s Empirical Analysis
908 F.3d 68 · 2018
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2251 (Child Pornography Prevention Act of 1996)
Relies on United States v. Leon · United States v. Calandra · Herring v. United States · United States v. Bynum · United States v. Guijon-Ortiz
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“facts well known [to the investigating officer] but omitted from the affidavit presented to the magistrate.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[U]ncontroverted facts known to [the officer] but inadvertently not presented to the magistrate”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“look beyond the four corners of the affidavit,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.