King v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
March 2010
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Cohen v. United States · Johnson v. Lutz · United States v. Zapata · Zickefoose v. State · United States v. Lieberman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(a) A person attempts to commit a crime when, acting with the culpability required for commission of the crime, he engages in conduct that constitutes a substantial step toward commission of the crime. An attempt to commit a crime is a felony or misdemeanor of the same class as the crime attempted.... (b) It is no defense that, because of a misapprehension of the ctreumstances, it would have been impossible for the ac-eused person to commit the crime attempted.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. King v. State“believing or intending that the recipient is a child less than eighteen,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. King v. State“or an individual the person believes to be a child”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. King v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.