Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 908 NE2D 673 - King v. State

King v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
March 2010
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Cohen v. United States · Johnson v. Lutz · United States v. Zapata · Zickefoose v. State · United States v. Lieberman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(a) A person attempts to commit a crime when, acting with the culpability required for commission of the crime, he engages in conduct that constitutes a substantial step toward commission of the crime. An attempt to commit a crime is a felony or misdemeanor of the same class as the crime attempted.... (b) It is no defense that, because of a misapprehension of the ctreumstances, it would have been impossible for the ac-eused person to commit the crime attempted.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “believing or intending that the recipient is a child less than eighteen,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “or an individual the person believes to be a child”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.