Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 908 NW2D 601 - State v. Washington

State v. Washington’s Empirical Analysis

2018

Citation profile

58
cited by 58 later decisions
2
states following
March 2026
most recently cited

57 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Blakely v. Washington · Toussie v. United States · Cunningham v. California · State v. Maurstad · State of Minnesota v. Brandon Wayne Riggs

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 58 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language 446 (5th ed. 2011). Applying this definition would mean that when the sentencing court classifies a prior offense for criminal history purposes, it is to base its decision on the offense definitions and sentencing policies in effect at”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.