908 So. 2d 1024 - Ex Parte McGriff’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
24
cited by 24 later decisions
3
states following
August 2016
most recently cited
23 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on In the Matter of Samuel Winship · Ring v. Arizona · Mullaney v. Wilbur · Patterson v. New York · McMillan v. Pennsylvania
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““A person does not commit murder ... [and by extension capital murder] if he was moved to act by a sudden heat of passion caused by a provocation recognized by law, and before there had been a reasonable time for the passion to cool and for reason to reassert itself. The burden of injecting the issue of killing under legal provocation is on the defendant, but this does not shift the burden of proof. This subsection does not apply to. a prosecution for, or preclude a conviction of, manslaughter or other crime.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[E]very accused is entitled to have charges given, which would not be misleading, which correctly state the law of his case, and which are supported by any evidence, however weak, insufficient, or doubtful in credibility.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“`It is a basic tenet of Alabama law that”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.