908 So. 2d 1168
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided August 24, 2005
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2005-08-24
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently May 2011
1 state decisions
Relies on 884 So. 2d 950 - Richardson v. State · 862 So. 2d 807 - McCall v. State · 898 So. 2d 80 - McCord v. State
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 2005-08-24
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1Affirmed. See Teal v. State, 862 So.2d 871 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003), review granted, 898 So.2d 81 (Fla.2005); McCall v. State, 862 So.2d 807 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003); Middleton v. State, 721 So.2d 792 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998).
¶2As this court did in Tealand McCall, we certify direct conflict with Richardson v. State, 884 So.2d 950 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003), review granted, 898 So.2d 81 (Fla.2005).
¶3Affirmed; conflict certified.