Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 908 SO2D 1183 - Jackson v. State

Jackson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
March 2006
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 472 So. 2d 738 - Williams v. State · Lee v. State · Toro v. State · State v. Pawle

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[e]videntiary hearings are adversarial in nature, and the rules of evidence and procedure are mystifyingly complex to all but the most sophisticated non-lawyers.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “The need for an evidentiary hearing itself implies that [the first] three of the four factors are involved.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[A]ny doubt about the need for counsel must be resolved in favor of the indigent defendant.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.