Jackson v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
March 2006
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 472 So. 2d 738 - Williams v. State · Lee v. State · Toro v. State · State v. Pawle
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[e]videntiary hearings are adversarial in nature, and the rules of evidence and procedure are mystifyingly complex to all but the most sophisticated non-lawyers.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The need for an evidentiary hearing itself implies that [the first] three of the four factors are involved.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[A]ny doubt about the need for counsel must be resolved in favor of the indigent defendant.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.