¶1Affirmed. See Teal v. State, 862 So.2d 871 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003), review granted, 898 So.2d 81 (Fla.2005); McCall v. State, 862 So.2d 807 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003).
¶2*1185As this court did in Tealand McCall, we certify direct conflict with Richardson v. State, 884 So.2d 950 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003), review granted, 898 So.2d 81 (Fla.2005).
¶3Affirmed; conflict certified.