Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

908 So. 2d 302

Smith v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 18, 2005

Supreme Court of Alabama · decided 2005-03-18

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently December 2010

1 state decisions

Relies on Horsley v. Horsley · 852 So. 2d 89 - Moore v. Crocker

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2005-03-18

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

SMITH, Justice.*

¶1The writ of certiorari is quashed as having been improvidently granted. Our quashing of the writ should not be construed as approving all the language, reasons, or statements of law in the Court of Criminal Appeals’ opinion, including its discussion of Rule 3.3, Ala. R.Crim. P. Horsley v. Horsley, 291 Ala. 782, 280 So.2d 155 (1973). See also Moore v. Crocker, 852 So.2d 89 (Ala.2002).

¶2WRIT QUASHED.

NABERS, C.J., and SEE, LYONS, HARWOOD, WOODALL, STUART, BOLIN, and PARKER, JJ., concur.

¶3This case was originally assigned to another Justice; it was reassigned to Justice Smith on January 17, 2005.

/908/so2d/302 · .json · Public domain