¶1We affirm the trial court’s summary denial of appellant’s motion to correct illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). Insofar as appellant’s claims included a sentencing challenge based on Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), we note that this decision does not apply retroactively to appellant’s sentence which became final in 1998. See Hughes v. State, 901 So.2d 837 (Fla.2005).
908 So. 2d 521
Puzio v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided June 29, 2005
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2005-06-29
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently October 2010
1 state decisions
Relies on Apprendi v. New Jersey · Hughes v. State
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 2005-06-29
View the full empirical analysis of this case →