Cargile-Schrage v. Schrage’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 382 So. 2d 1197 - Canakaris v. Canakaris · 710 So. 2d 601 - Fleming v. Fleming · 863 So. 2d 398 - Taylor v. Institute for Medical Weight Loss · 838 So. 2d 1237 - Cole v. HERITAGE COMMUNITIES, INC.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In determining whether the trial judge has abused his [or her] discretion, a reviewing court should consider “whether the denial of the continuance creates an injustice for the movant; whether the cause of the request for continuance was unforeseeable by the movant and not the result of dilatory practices; and whether the opposing party would suffer any prejudice or inconvenience as a result of a continuance.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.