908 So. 2d 819 - Young v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
October 2011
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Delaware v. Van Arsdall · 895 So. 2d 836 - Bush v. State · 430 So. 2d 832 - Read v. State · 574 So. 2d 685 - McQuarter v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) A person commits the crime of receiving stolen property if he intentionally possesses, receives, retains[,] or disposes of stolen property knowing that it has been stolen.... * * * (3)(a) Evidence that the person charged under this section stole the property that is the subject of the charge of receiving stolen property is not a defense to a charge under this section; however, dual charges of both stealing and receiving the same property shall not be brought against a single defendant in a single jurisdiction.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.