Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 909 F.2d 1035 - Breuer v. Hart

Breuer v. Hart’s Empirical Analysis

909 F.2d 1035 · 1990

Citation profile

102
cited by 102 later decisions
4
states following
December 2022
most recently cited

48 federal appellate · 8 district · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 102 later decisions — most recently December 2022 · most notably O'Connor v. Steeves (1993), Spiegla v. Hull (2004)

48 federal appellate · 8 district · 4 state decisions

6501990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. Doyle · Pickering v. Board of Education of Township High School District 205 Will County Illinois · Connick v. Myers

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 102 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]here is a particularly urgent need for close teamwork among those involved in the 'high stakes' field of law enforcement. Speech that might not interfere with work in an environment less dependent on order, discipline, and esprit de corps could be debilitating to a police force. Such considerations are permissible in weighing constitutional violations.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[t]he public employer is not required to wait until those working relationships actually disintegrate if immediate action might prevent such disintegration.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “(1) the need to maintain discipline or harmony among co-workers; (2) the need for confidentiality; (3) the need to curtail conduct which impedes the [employee’s] proper and competent performance of his daily duties; and (4) the need to encourage a close and personal relationship between the employee and his superiors, where that relationship calls for loyalty and confidence.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.