Simmons v. Interstate Commerce Commission’s Empirical Analysis
909 F.2d 186 · 1990
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 12 U.S.C. § 36 · 28 U.S.C. § 2321 · 49 U.S.C. § 10101 (Bus Regulatory Reform Act of 1982) · 49 U.S.C. § 10746 · 49 U.S.C. § 10901 · 5 U.S.C. § 702
Relies on Warth v. Seldin · Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. Camp · Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising Commission · Sierra Club v. Morton · Clarke v. Securities Industry Assn.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“so marginally related to or inconsistent with the purposes implicit in the statute that it cannot be reasonably assumed that Congress intended to permit the suit”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Since Simmons has not established standing in his own right (as representative of UTU members), he cannot have standing as a representative of the public interest.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.