Calixto v. Lesmes’s Empirical Analysis
909 F.3d 1079 · 2018
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
September 2021
most recently cited
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 22 U.S.C. § 9001 · 22 U.S.C. § 9003
Relies on Feder v. Evans-Feder · Mozes v. Mozes · United States v. $242,484.00 · Gitter v. Gitter · De Silva v. Pitts
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a) it is in breach of rights of custody attributed to a person ... under the law of the State in which the child was habitually resident immediately before the removal or retention; and b) at the time of removal or retention those rights were actually exercised ... or would have been exercised but for the removal or retention.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Pfeiffer v. Bachotet
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.