Weitzner v. Sanofi Pasteur Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
909 F.3d 604 · 2018
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 28 U.S.C. § 1658 · 47 U.S.C. § 227
Relies on Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United States · American Pipe & Construction Co. v. Utah · Crown, Cork & Seal Co. v. Parker · Devlin v. Scardelletti · Chardon v. Fumero Soto
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“American Pipe [, supra , 414 U.S. 538 [ 94 S.Ct. 756 ] ] does not permit the maintenance of a follow-on class action past expiration of the statute of limitations.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“we [the court that issued Yang ] recognize the abrogation of Yang v. Odom on this point”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.