Moore-Jones v. Quick’s Empirical Analysis
909 F.3d 983 · 2018
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Graham v. Connor · Pearson v. Callahan · Scott v. Harris · United States v. Lanier · Brosseau v. Haugen
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“to 'identify a case where an officer acting under similar circumstances ... was held to have violated the Fourth Amendment' is often fatal to a claim outside of obvious cases .”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“A case need not be 'directly on point, but existing precedent must have placed the statutory or constitutional question beyond debate.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“violated a statutory or constitutional right, and (2) that the right was 'clearly established' at the time of the challenged conduct.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Fischer v. Hoven
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.