Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

909 N.W.2d 341

In re Kinney

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 26, 2018

Supreme Court of Minnesota · decided 2018-03-26

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently April 2019

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2018-03-26

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Petitioner Michael James Kinney was admitted to practice law in the State of Minnesota in 2000. In May 2014, petitioner voluntarily resigned from the practice of law in Minnesota. On October 16, 2017, petitioner filed a petition for reinstatement *342to the practice of law in Minnesota. See Rule 18(a), Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility (RLPR). The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility investigated the matter and reported her conclusions to a panel of the Lawyers Professional Responsibility Board. See Rule 18(b), RLPR.

¶2After considering the written submissions of the parties, the panel found that petitioner has proven his ethical fitness and competence to practice law by clear and convincing evidence and has met all of the conditions for reinstatement.

¶3We have independently reviewed the file and approve the panel's recommendation.

¶4Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein,

¶5IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner Michael James Kinney is reinstated to the practice of law in Minnesota, subject to payment of the applicable registration fee under Rule 2, Rules of the Supreme Court on Lawyer Registration.

/909/nw2d/341 · .json · Public domain