Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

909 N.W.2d 58

In re Olson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 16, 2018

Supreme Court of Minnesota · decided 2018-03-16

Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently March 2026

23 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2018-03-16

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility has filed a petition for disciplinary action alleging that respondent Jeffrey H. Olson has committed professional misconduct warranting public discipline-namely, giving a third party access to his trust account in order to facilitate a business loan, which he knew or should have known was fraudulent, while he was suspended from the practice of law for engaging in similar misconduct. See Minn. R. Prof. Conduct 1.15(a), 8.4(c).

¶2Respondent withdraws his answer, admits that his conduct has violated the Rules of Professional Conduct, waives his rights pursuant to Rule 14, Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility (RLPR), and has entered into a stipulation with the Director wherein they jointly recommend that the appropriate discipline is disbarment.

¶3This court has independently reviewed the file and approves the jointly recommended disposition.

¶4Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein,

¶5IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

¶61. Respondent Jeffrey H. Olson is disbarred, effective as of the date of this order.

¶72. Respondent shall comply with Rule 26, RLPR (requiring notice of disbarment to clients, opposing counsel, and tribunals).

¶83. Respondent shall pay $900 in costs pursuant to Rule 24(a), RLPR.

¶9BY THE COURT:

¶10/s/ ______________________________

¶11David L. Lillehaug

¶12Associate Justice

/909/nw2d/58 · .json · Public domain