State v. Genovesi’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
14 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently May 2024
14 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Chapman v. State of California · Delaware v. Van Arsdall · Chambers v. Maroney · Mincey v. Arizona
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Itlhe appropriate standard governing the inevitable discovery exception is whether 'the prosecution can establish by a preponderance of the evidence that the information ultimately would have been discovered by lawful means.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Topanotes“determine whether the [search of Topanotes] fall[s] within the recognized limited exceptions to the Fourth Amendment warrant requirement.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Topanotes“'must show that the evidence 'would have been discovered, not simply that it "could”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Topanotes
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.