State v. Thomas’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 660 So. 2d 1189 - State Ex Rel. Glover v. State · 475 So. 2d 336 - State v. Counterman · 680 So. 2d 77 - State v. Labiche · 768 So. 2d 99 - State v. Dixon · 593 So. 2d 676 - State v. Daigle
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Because Defendant failed to file his motion for appeal -within the time provided by La.Code Crim.P. art. 914, his conviction and sentence | ?,became final. Once Defendant’s conviction and sentence became final, he could no longer obtain an appeal by simply filing a'motion for appeal. State v. LaBiche, 96-433 (La.App. 3 Cir. 7/31/96) , 680 So.2d 77 . Thus, Defendant had to obtain reinstatement of his right to appeal by way of a properly filed application for post-conviction relief. Id.; State v. Dixon, 00-516-(La.App. 3 Cir. 6/7/00), 768 So.2d 99 ; State v. Counterman, 475 So.2d 336 (La.1985).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Under La.Code Crim.P. art. 914, a motion for appeal must be made no later than thirty days after either the rendition of the judgment from which the appeal is taken or the ruling on a motion to reconsider sentence filed pursuant to La.Code Crim.P. art. 881.1.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.