Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 909 SO2D 500 - Moore v. State

Moore v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
May 2009
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 891 So. 2d 517 - Hale v. State · 839 So. 2d 715 - Gordon v. Regier · 880 So. 2d 533 - Tanguay v. State · Mullins v. State · City of Miami Beach v. Royal World Metropolitan, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “section 394.925, which states that the Act applies to all persons "currently in custody" or "sentenced to total confinement in the future," in conjunction with the other provisions in the Act, provides that involuntary civil commitment proceedings may be brought only against those persons in custody at the moment the proceedings are commenced; there is no provision in the Act for proceeding against those persons who are on supervision but no longer in custody.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
    e.g. Larimore v. State
  2. “While Ducharme may have been entitled to a writ of habeas corpus after being sentenced to time served as he was arguably not legally detained from June 13 to June 16, that does not divest the circuit court of jurisdiction to adjudicate the commitment petition”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
    e.g. Larimore v. State
  3. “WHETHER A PERSON WHO WAS NOT IN CUSTODY ON JANUARY 1, 1999, IS ELIGIBLE FOR CIVIL COMMITMENT UNDER THE JIMMY RYCE ACT IF THAT PERSON WAS SENTENCED TO TOTAL CONFINEMENT AFTER JANUARY 1, 1999, BUT THE QUALIFYING CONVICTION OCCURRED BEFORE JANUARY 1, 1999.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. Greene v. State

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.