Barnes v. Crosby’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
December 2012
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 878 So. 2d 1236 - Baker v. State · 859 So. 2d 1244 - Collins v. State · Pinder v. State · Carmen v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A petition for writ of habeas corpus cannot be used as a substitute for an appropriate postconviction motion. Barnes has not demonstrated that such a motion would have been inadequate or ineffective to address his claim, and his petition was not filed within the time period allowed for filing a rule 3.850 motion. Thus, we cannot fault the circuit court for not treating the petition as a rule 3.850 motion. Accordingly, we affirm the trial court's dismissal of the petition, although on a different ground than the one relied on by the trial court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Richardson v. State“Because Barnes was attacking the validity of the proceedings in the Tenth Judicial Circuit Court, jurisdiction to entertain the petition lay with that court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Richardson v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.