Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 909 SO2D 597 - Galindez v. State

Galindez v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
January 2009
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 868 So. 2d 632 - Spradley v. State · 891 So. 2d 1066 - Hall v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he triggering event for the two-year period in which to file a rule 3.850 motion is not the date of the judgment in the criminal proceeding in which the prisoner pleaded, but the date on which the DOC informed the prisoner of the gain time forfeiture and that the DOC determination of gain time constituted newly discovered information within the meaning of rule 3.850(b)(1).”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.