Street v. State

Mark L. STREET, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 7, 2005.

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2005-09-07

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently October 2009

1 state decisions

Relies on Studnicka v. State · Cooper v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2005-09-07

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Mark L. Street, Arcadia, pro se.

¶2No appearance required for appellee.

¶3 *605 PER CURIAM.

¶4Although it does not appear that appellant previously raised these specific Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800 claims, as the trial court's order suggests, the issues raised are meritless nonetheless. See Studnicka v. State,679 So.2d 819, 822 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996) (stating that habitual felony offender sentence pronounced after October 1, 1988 is not a sentence governed by sentencing guidelines); Cooper v. State,902 So.2d 945, 947 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005) (any error in guidelines scoresheet harmless when defendant is sentenced as habitual offender). Furthermore, appellant agreed to a negotiated plea and sentence.

¶5Affirmed.

¶6STEVENSON, C.J., WARNER and KLEIN, JJ., concur.