Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 909 SW2D 912 - Broxton v. State

Broxton v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

108
cited by 108 later decisions
2
states following
July 2018
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 103 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 108 later decisions — most recently July 2018 · most notably Ladd v. State (1999), Cantu v. State (1997)

3 federal appellate · 103 state decisions

390199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Wainwright v. Witt · Soberon v. United States · Daniel v. Security Pacific National Bank · National Union Fire Insurance v. Helfand · United States v. Alaska

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 108 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the circumstances of the offense, the defendant's character and background, and the personal moral culpability of the defendant,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “An objection stating one legal theory may not be used to support a different legal theory on appeal.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[E]ven constitutional errors may be waived by failure to object at trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.