Busch v. Plews

Decided October 21, 1952

Relies on 21 N.J. Super. 583 - Sieper v. Dept. of Civil Service, Passaic · 19 N.J. Super. 195 - Busch v. Plews

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1952-10-21

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently June 2000

4 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

IONA M. BUSCH, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS EXECUTRIX UNDER THE LAST WILL AND TESTAMENT OF LILLIAN W. SEIDEL, DECEASED, ET ALS., PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,
v.
LOUISE PLEWS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, AND LIBERTY TITLE AND TRUST COMPANY, ET ALS., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

¶1Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued October 20, 1952.Decided October 21, 1952.

¶2Before Judges EASTWOOD, GOLDMANN and FRANCIS.

¶3Mr. Wm. Elmer Brown, Jr., argued the cause for the defendant-appellant.

¶4Mr. Augustine A. Repetto argued the cause for the plaintiffs-respondents (Messrs. Bolte and Repetto, attorneys).

¶5PER CURIAM.

¶6The judgment under review is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Haneman in the Superior Court, Chancery Division, 19 N.J. Super. 195 (1952).

How this case has been cited

IONA M. BUSCH, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS EXECUTRIX UNDER THE LAST WILL AND TESTAMENT OF LILLIAN W. SEIDEL, DECEASED, ET ALS., PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. LOUISE PLEWS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, AND LIBERTY TITLE AND TRUST COMPANY, ET ALS., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

IONA M. BUSCH, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS EXECUTRIX UNDER THE LAST WILL AND TESTAMENT OF LILLIAN W. SEIDEL, DECEASED, ET ALS., PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,
v.
LOUISE PLEWS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, AND LIBERTY TITLE AND TRUST COMPANY, ET ALS., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.