State v. Mark Ceppi’s Empirical Analysis
2014
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
November 2018
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Mechanik · State v. Aponte · Wilkinson v. State Crime Laboratory Commission · State v. Lynch · State v. Clark
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“is a retrospective one, administered at the close of all the evidence to determine whether the admission of certain evidence was harmless in light of all the evidence admitted on that point.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Impermissible bolstering occurs typically 'when one witness offers an opinion concerning the truthfulness of the testimony of another witness.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“will not disturb the trial justice's ruling unless the abuse of discretion [or error] resulted in prejudicial error.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Gaudreau
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.