Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 91 Ariz. 371 - Coyner Crop Dusters v. Marsh

Coyner Crop Dusters v. Marsh’s Empirical Analysis

1962

Citation profile

62
cited by 62 later decisions
2
states following
September 2016
most recently cited

62 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 62 later decisions — most recently September 2016 · most notably Cummings v. Prater (1963), Alires v. Southern Pacific Company (1963)

62 state decisions

400196219701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Layton v. Rocha · Fuentes v. Tucker · Taylor v. Fitzpatrick · Crocker v. Johnston · Leigh v. Swartz

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 62 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ * * * However, it has been the rule of long standing in this jurisdiction that “ ‘ * * * instructions must be considered as a whole, and that a case will not be reversed when the alleged error is predicated on an isolated part of the instructions, unless it appears that the questioned instruction, when considered in connection with all the instructions in the case, was calculated to mislead the jury as to the law.’”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “"No party may assign as error the giving or the failure to give an instruction unless he objects thereto before the jury retires to consider its verdict, stating distinctly the matter to which he objects and the grounds of his objection."”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. ““The defense of contributory negligence * * * shall, in all cases whatsoever, be a question of fact and shall, at all times, be left to the jury.” Ariz.Const. Art. 18, § 5, A.R.S.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.