State v. Jones’s Empirical Analysis
1909
Citation profile
2 district · 21 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently September 1980
2 district · 21 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Drinkall v. Spiegel · People v. Garnett · State v. Graham · Memphis & Little Rook Ry. v. Adams
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We do not concur in this interpretation of the statute. * * * One who, with a full knowledge that the crime has been committed, harbors and protects the felon, is guilty as accessory and may be punished as such, whether the principal offender be arrested or not. Any other view of the statute would permit a person to go unpunished who has been guilty of the most flagrant act of harboring and protecting a felon before a warrant of arrest could be procured or an indictment could be returned. * * *”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Howard v. People“Now, the words 'charged with,' as applied to the perpetration of crime, cannot be said to have a well-known and established legal significance. Chief Justice Andrews, speaking for the Supreme Court of Connecticut, said: 'The expression”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Howard v. People““An accessory after the fact is a person who, after a full knowledge that a crime has been committed, conceals it from the magistrate, or harbors and protects the person charged with or found guilty of the crime.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Roland v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.