Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 91 CAL 41 - Alaniz v. Casenave

Alaniz v. Casenave’s Empirical Analysis

1891

Citation profile

37
cited by 37 later decisions
9
states following
September 2010
most recently cited

2 district · 34 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently September 2010 · most notably Steinberger v. Steinberger (1943), Cooney v. Glynn (1910)

2 district · 34 state decisions

801891190019101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Brison v. Brison · Brison v. Brison · Feeney v. Howard · Broder v. Conklin · Adams v. Lambard

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““If by means of a parol promise to reconvey a party obtains an absolute deed without consideration from one to whom he stands in a fiduciary relation, the violation of the promise is constructive fraud, although at ■ the time of the promise there was no intention not to perform.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.