Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 91 CAL 428 - Bohnert v. Bohnert

Bohnert v. Bohnert’s Empirical Analysis

1891

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
10
states following
October 1983
most recently cited

29 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently October 1983 · most notably Bowman v. Bowman (1947), Gay v. Gay (1905)

29 state decisions — followed in 10 states

601891190019101920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Sharon v. Sharon · Robinson v. Robinson · Reilly v. Reilly · Everett v. Everett · Ex parte Winter

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “As to the granting of alimony pendente lite, that is a matter resting in the sound discretion of the court, and this record discloses nothing to justify us in disturbing that discretion as exercised by the trial court in this cause. Under section 137 of the Civil Code, the power to make an allowance to the wife for her support as alimony, or an allowance to her for the purpose of defending or prosecuting the action, is not exhausted upon the rendition of the judgment in the trial court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““ While an action for divorce is pending, the court may, in its discretion, require the husband to pay, as alimony, any money necessary to enable the wife .... to prosecute or defend the action.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. ““An action is deemed to be pending from the time of its commencement until its final determination upon appeal, or until the time for appeal has passed, unless the judgment is sooner satisfied.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.