Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 91 Cal. App. 2d 163 - People v. Applegate

91 Cal. App. 2d 163 - People v. Applegate’s Empirical Analysis

1949

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
1
states following
May 1984
most recently cited

24 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently May 1984

24 state decisions

18019491950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Connally v. General Construction Co. · People v. Newland · United States v. L. Cohen Grocery Co. · In Re Blaney · People v. Talbot

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Upon any indictment for embezzlement, it is a sufficient defense that the property was appropriated openly and avowedly, and under a claim of title preferred in good faith, even though such claim is untenable. But this provision does not excuse the unlawful retention of the property of another to offset or pay demands held against him. ’ ’”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.