Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 91 CALAPP2D 501 - People v. Jones

People v. Jones’s Empirical Analysis

1949

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
March 1955
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 89 Cal. App. 2d 467 - People v. Ford · People v. Pianezzi · People v. Showers · 49 Cal. App. 2d 243 - People v. Hunter · 70 Cal. App. 444 - People v. Buttulia

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “No objection was made to the argument. It was not assigned as misconduct. The court was not requested to instruct the jury to disregard it. Under these circumstances appellant waived his objection to the challenged statements (case cited) and the misconduct if any will not warrant reversal.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.