Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

91 Cal. App. 2d 677

In re Perry

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 5, 1949

California Court of Appeal · decided 1949-05-05

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently March 1951

2 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1949-05-05

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PETERS, P. J.

¶1The writ of habeas corpus was issued on a petition averring that the prisoner was being held without a commitment. According to the record that has been filed, that averment, when made, was justified by the facts then in the knowledge of the attorney for the petitioner, but the record shows that in fact a commitment had been issued.

¶2It appearing to the court that the trial court had jurisdiction of the person and the subject matter, and that a valid commitment had been issued, it is the order of the court that the writ of habeas corpus be discharged and the prisoner is remanded to custody.

¶3Ward, J., and Bray, J., concurred.

/91/calapp2d/677 · .json · Public domain