Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 91 CALAPP2D 901 - Turner v. Elliott

Turner v. Elliott’s Empirical Analysis

1949

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
3
states following
April 1975
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Douglass v. City of Los Angeles · Miller v. Fano · Gomez v. Scanlan · Maher v. Wilson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “was a victim of the robbery, caused the police to be summoned, pointed out [plaintiffs] Butcher and Moore, stated that they were the men who had robbed him, and when [plaintiff] Turner interceded he directed the officers to arrest Turner also. Without his activities there would have been no identification of the plaintiffs and no arrests.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “bear no resemblance to the circumstances of the arrests of plaintiffs herein.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.