Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 91 CALAPP2D 931 - Raphael v. Raphael

Raphael v. Raphael’s Empirical Analysis

1949

Citation profile

75
cited by 75 later decisions
3
states following
July 1990
most recently cited

67 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 75 later decisions — most recently July 1990 · most notably Estate of Neilson (1962), 46 Cal. 2d 697 - Woods v. Security-First National Bank (1956)

67 state decisions

410194919501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Estate of Bristol v. Young · Huber v. Huber · 27 Cal. 2d 131 - Sears v. Rule · Kenney v. Kenney · Williams v. Babb

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 75 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “... that all property then owned by them or subsequently acquired was to belong to them equally or, as respondent put it, "fifty-fifty.' " Similarly, in Estate of Raphael (1949), 91 Cal.App.2d 931, 936-937 [ 206 P.2d 391, 394 ], the husband's statement as related by his wife that "... everything he had was mine, and everything I had was his; that we were partners in everything, and everything was fifty-fifty”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “The object of the oral agreement of transmutation was fully performed when the agreement was made for it immediately transmuted and converted the separate property of each spouse into community property, and nothing further remained to be done.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.