91 Cal. App. 3d 660 - In Re Brindle’s Empirical Analysis
1979
Citation profile
48 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 48 later decisions — most recently July 2018 · most notably 24 Cal. 4th 676 - Barner v. Leeds (2000), 35 Cal. 3d 86 - People v. Mroczko (1983)
48 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Faretta v. California · Gideon v. Wainwright · United States v. Wade · Escobedo v. Illinois
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The function of habeas corpus has evolved from the traditional remedy for release of a prisoner to include a declaration of rights of a prisoner not entitled to outright release. [Citations.] The writ of habeas corpus may be used to secure fundamental rights of a person lawfully in custody.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“`request of the defendant or upon order of the court.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.