Cunningham v. Snelling’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

4 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “Plaintiff in error shall assign errors in writing at the time of filing the record and each error shall be separately alleged and particularly specified; Provided , That when errors are assigned upon exceptions to the ruling of the court in the admission or rejection of evidence, which go to the same point, it shall be sufficient to refer to the folio numbers of the record where such rulings and exceptions appear without particularly specifying the evidence admitted or rejected. * * *”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Efsiever v. People

2. “An assignment stating that the court erred in excluding or admitting evidence, without further particularity, 'cannot be considered.' Heinricy v. Richart , 73 Colo. 156 , 214 Pac. 391 ; Andrew v. Carpet Co. , 72 Colo. 472 , 211 Pac. 378 ; Conner v. Sullivan , 84 Colo. 572 , 272 Pac. 623 .”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Efsiever v. People