Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 91 Conn. App. 142 - Correa v. Ward

91 Conn. App. 142 - Correa v. Ward’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
August 2016
most recently cited

13 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1437F

Relies on Capalbo v. Planning & Zoning Board of Appeals · Carmel Hollow Associates Ltd. Partnership v. Town of Bethlehem · Wasko v. Manella · Visco v. Cody · Szczapa v. United Parcel Service, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) The tenant is using the dwelling unit for an illegal purpose or for a purpose which is in violation of the rental agreement or for nonpayment of rent; (2) the landlord seeks in good faith to recover possession of the dwelling unit for immediate use as his own abode; (3) the condition complained of was caused by the wilful actions of the tenant or another person in his household or a person on the premises with his consent; or (4) the landlord seeks to recover possession on the basis of a notice to terminate a periodic tenancy, which notice was given to the tenant before the tenant's complaint.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[a] landlord shall not maintain an action or proceeding against a tenant to recover possession of a dwelling unit ... within six months after: (1) [t]he tenant has in good faith attempted to remedy by any lawful means, including contacting officials of the state or of any town, city or borough or public agency or filing a complaint with a fair rent commission, any condition constituting a violation of any provisions of chapter 368o, or of chapter 412, or of any state statute or regulation, or of the housing and health ordinances of the municipality wherein the premises which are the subject of the complaint lie....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “establishes retaliation as a presumption, if a summary process action is initiated within six months of a complaint, which the landlord must successfully rebut.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.